Manipur CM willing to talk to Nagaland counterpart

NISHIT DHOLABHAI

New Delhi, Jun 8 :
The ice seems to be melting between the hills and vales of Nagaland and Manipur, where Nagas and Meiteis have experienced a widening rift of late, especially on the issue of integration.

Manipur chief minister Okram Ibobi Singh today said he was willing to talk to Nagaland chief minister Neiphiu Rio.
Earlier this week, Rio had conceded to The Telegraph that there could not be a solution to the Naga problem without talking to Manipur. He had added that there was no space for a dialogue as Ibobi was shy of even visiting Nagaland for official programmes.
“The next time he invites me, I am ready to go there,” Ibobi Singh told this correspondent today after a meeting with Union home minister P. Chidambaram. He had called on Chidambaram to discuss early operationalisation of the integrated checkpost at Moreh.
Ibobi said he had wanted to attend the Hornbill festival but could not do so for want of time. The weeklong festival is celebrated at the tourist village of Kisama in Nagaland every year from December 1, the day Nagaland was formed in 1963.
While disputes over boundary and sharing of river water are common among neighbours, be it Maharashtra and Karnataka or Tamil Nadu and Kerala, in the Northeast the problem assumes ethnic dimensions and solutions depend on how leaders address it.
The political roots of Ibobi and Rio are apparently catching up in what could be seen as a beginning of reconciliation. While Ibobi is a Congressman, Rio is a former Congressman.
With hopes of a dialogue between Imphal and Kohima, reconciliation here may not just be between the political leadership but also between communities. Even Naga rebels feel dialogue between communities is a must, although they have not come out as openly as the “overgrounds” on the issue.
“We should be talking to each other. After all we are all Indians,” said Ibobi.
The Manipur strongman may have touched a raw nerve here as Rio’s regional party, the Naga People’s Front (NPF), caters to Naga sub-nationalist sentiment.
Rio was unable to talk till now as his party also toes the integration line on getting Nagas in all states under a single administrative unit.
There is, however, a shift. Rio said this week that whether integration — earlier the principal demand of the NSCN (I-M) — takes place or not, the interest of Nagas should be protected in Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh and Assam. The Naga population is concentrated in Nagaland, but it is spread over other northeastern states and Myanmar.
The leaders’ willingness to talk — they have not seen eye-to-eye in the past — also suggests that a solution to the NSCN (I-M)’s negotiation may be in sight. Sources said the talks were in an “advanced stage” and a resolution may be achieved before winter this year. The NSCN (I-M) is in talks with the Centre for 15 years since it signed a ceasefire agreement.
Relations soured between the Nagas and valley-based NGOs in 2010 when Ibobi refused to allow NSCN (Isak-Muivah) general secretary Thuingaleng Muivah to visit his native village Somdal in Ukhrul district. The Naga NGOs imposed an economic blockade, which stretched for over three months.
Rio is hurt that the Ibobi government tried its best to prevent him and his party leader T.R. Zeliang, a former MP, from visiting Manipur’s Naga-majority districts during Manipur Assembly elections, which the NPF contested this year.
Rio said it would suffice to say that the two states were living as neighbours and would continue to do so. However, Ibobi’s statement may change the dynamics in the region.
Insurgency in Manipur is attributed, to some extent, to the formation of the state of Nagaland. Later, the NSCN (I-M)’s demand for integration of Naga-dominated areas caused much heartburn to the majority Meitei community in the valley, insecure as it was about Manipur’s territorial integrity.